Chapter 4 Document Analysis:
1. I believe that the tone is too informal, like the commenter is familiar with the author. I don’t think they should use such informal language. For example, the commentator says “Huh? What does this exactly mean?”. The commentator should get rid of the “Huh” because that is very informal language, and it could make the author feel inadequate. 2. I think the collaborator addresses the larger issues perfectly, because he wants to make sure that the readers will understand the author. Which is a big issue in my eyes, but again he needs to rethink the language that they are using. 3. The collaborator does a sufficient job at addressing the writing because they want to make sure that the writing is able to connect with the audience, which is the main concern with the writing. 4. The collaborator focuses on the goal by asking questions that would lead the elaboration of the topic...